Wednesday, 31 August 2011

Zizek on the riots

The current London Review of Books has an article on the riots that readers of the blog might enjoy or find irritating.

Sunday, 21 August 2011

Leicester Tigers 20th August 2011

In the search for new cultural experiences I attended my first Rugby Union match here in Leicester. Tigers were playing a pre-season friendly against Lyon. As a novice at these things and thinking for much of the time that I was at a ballet, it soon became clear that Tigers were a team and Lyon a group of individuals who occasionally became a team. Score Tigers 39 Lyon 3. The whole event was not what I expected in that it was very friendly, fun, safe and no sense of threat. Apart from yellow jacketed stewards and security people there was no visible police presence. Above all the age range of those attending 4-80+ and the way children and young people, families were all visible welcome. Great fun.



I was accompanied by our dear friend Manoj Barot. He took the photo and I thank him for permission to reproduce it. Transport via Swift Fox Taxis disabled cab. Any one else interested in coming with me to another match do ask. Carers go free.

Friday, 12 August 2011

A comment from the right

My dear friend Shirley Siriwardena sent me the article below. He writes:


This is the only sensible article appeared in a daily newspaper this week analysing the reality of what happened in the last few days in London and other places. This is from the "Telegraph" and written by not a left-wing journalist. Writer is a good Conservative and has the courage of his conviction to blame the people responsible for the present situation in Britain.


Here is the article.



The moral decay of our society is as bad at the top as the bottom

“Telegraph”  Friday 11th August 2011 by Peter Oborne Politics 

David Cameron, Ed Miliband and the entire British political class came together yesterday to denounce the rioters. They were of course right to say that the actions of these looters, arsonists and muggers were abhorrent and criminal, and that the police should be given more support.

But there was also something very phony and hypocritical about all the shock and outrage expressed in parliament. MPs spoke about the week’s dreadful events as if they were nothing to do with them.

I cannot accept that this is the case. Indeed, I believe that the criminality in our streets cannot be dissociated from the moral disintegration in the highest ranks of modern British society. The last two decades have seen a terrifying decline in standards among the British governing elite. It has become acceptable for our politicians to lie and to cheat. An almost universal culture of selfishness and greed has grown up.

It is not just the feral youth of Tottenham who have forgotten they have duties as well as rights. So have the feral rich of Chelsea and Kensington. A few years ago, my wife and I went to a dinner party in a large house in west London. A security guard prowled along the street outside, and there was much talk of the “north-south divide”, which I took literally for a while until I realised that my hosts were facetiously referring to the difference between those who lived north and south of Kensington High Street.

Most of the people in this very expensive street were every bit as deracinated and cut off from the rest of Britain as the young, unemployed men and women who have caused such terrible damage over the last few days. For them, the repellent Financial Times magazine How to Spend It is a bible. I’d guess that few of them bother to pay British tax if they can avoid it, and that fewer still feel the sense of obligation to society that only a few decades ago came naturally to the wealthy and better off.

Yet we celebrate people who live empty lives like this. A few weeks ago, I noticed an item in a newspaper saying that the business tycoon Sir Richard Branson was thinking of moving his headquarters to Switzerland. This move was represented as a potential blow to the Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne, because it meant less tax revenue.
I couldn’t help thinking that in a sane and decent world such a move would be a blow to Sir Richard, not the Chancellor. People would note that a prominent and wealthy businessman was avoiding British tax and think less of him. Instead, he has a knighthood and is widely feted. The same is true of the brilliant retailer Sir Philip Green. Sir Philip’s businesses could never survive but for Britain’s famous social and political stability, our transport system to shift his goods and our schools to educate his workers.

Yet Sir Philip, who a few years ago sent an extraordinary £1 billion dividend offshore, seems to have little intention of paying for much of this. Why does nobody get angry or hold him culpable? I know that he employs expensive tax lawyers and that everything he does is legal, but he surely faces ethical and moral questions just as much as does a young thug who breaks into one of Sir Philip’s shops and steals from it?

Our politicians – standing sanctimoniously on their hind legs in the Commons yesterday – are just as bad. They have shown themselves prepared to ignore common decency and, in some cases, to break the law. David Cameron is happy to have some of the worst offenders in his Cabinet. Take the example of Francis Maude, who is charged with tackling public sector waste – which trade unions say is a euphemism for waging war on low‑paid workers. Yet Mr Maude made tens of thousands of pounds by breaching the spirit, though not the law, surrounding MPs’ allowances.

A great deal has been made over the past few days of the greed of the rioters for consumer goods, not least by Rotherham MP Denis MacShane who accurately remarked, “What the looters wanted was for a few minutes to enter the world of Sloane Street consumption.” This from a man who notoriously claimed £5,900 for eight laptops. Of course, as an MP he obtained these laptops legally through his expenses.
Yesterday, the veteran Labour MP Gerald Kaufman asked the Prime Minister to consider how these rioters can be “reclaimed” by society. Yes, this is indeed the same Gerald Kaufman who submitted a claim for three months’ expenses totalling £14,301.60, which included £8,865 for a Bang & Olufsen television.

Or take the Salford MP Hazel Blears, who has been loudly calling for draconian action against the looters. I find it very hard to make any kind of ethical distinction between Blears’s expense cheating and tax avoidance, and the straight robbery carried out by the looters.

The Prime Minister showed no sign that he understood that something stank about yesterday’s Commons debate. He spoke of morality, but only as something which applies to the very poor: “We will restore a stronger sense of morality and responsibility – in every town, in every street and in every estate.” He appeared not to grasp that this should apply to the rich and powerful as well.

The tragic truth is that Mr Cameron is himself guilty of failing this test. It is scarcely six weeks since he jauntily turned up at the News International summer party, even though the media group was at the time subject to not one but two police investigations. Even more notoriously, he awarded a senior Downing Street job to the former News of the World editor Andy Coulson, even though he knew at the time that Coulson had resigned after criminal acts were committed under his editorship. The Prime Minister excused his wretched judgment by proclaiming that “everybody deserves a second chance”. It was very telling yesterday that he did not talk of second chances as he pledged exemplary punishment for the rioters and looters.

These double standards from Downing Street are symptomatic of widespread double standards at the very top of our society. It should be stressed that most people (including, I know, Telegraph readers) continue to believe in honesty, decency, hard work, and putting back into society at least as much as they take out.

But there are those who do not. Certainly, the so-called feral youth seem oblivious to decency and morality. But so are the venal rich and powerful – too many of our bankers, footballers, wealthy businessmen and politicians.

Of course, most of them are smart and wealthy enough to make sure that they obey the law. That cannot be said of the sad young men and women, without hope or aspiration, who have caused such mayhem and chaos over the past few days. But the rioters have this defence: they are just following the example set by senior and respected figures in society. Let’s bear in mind that many of the youths in our inner cities have never been trained in decent values. All they have ever known is barbarism. Our politicians and bankers, in sharp contrast, tend to have been to good schools and universities and to have been given every opportunity in life.

Something has gone horribly wrong in Britain. If we are ever to confront the problems which have been exposed in the past week, it is essential to bear in mind that they do not only exist in inner-city housing estates.

The culture of greed and impunity we are witnessing on our TV screens stretches right up into corporate boardrooms and the Cabinet. It embraces the police and large parts of our media. It is not just its damaged youth, but Britain itself that needs a moral reformation.


Tuesday, 9 August 2011

Riot

The history of riot is long and interesting. Crowds are scary. Big groups are always in danger of going crazy or releasing the craziness in us all - both as individuals and groups. Is looting addictive?

Questions I would like answered. Where are the parents of the children involved? Where are the fathers especially? What happens when a boy grows up with an absent father or one who comes and goes? what does this do the boy's sense of himself and the internal paternal imago? How does a boy manage his feelings for authority figures like teachers and especially policemen when he feels so let down by his own father with whom he cannot vent his rage?

Any clues for the causes of the current outbreaks of rioting, looting and mayhem?


Sunday, 7 August 2011

A place called home

After half the last year was spent away in hospital to come home to this view is to be in paradise.


And no picture of paradise would now be complete without the new addition to our home, the cow.
It has brought much fun and conversation to all, well almost, of our visitors. Children seem to take it for granted we should have a cow. Our Hindu friends and visitors seem especially pleased. There is a suggestion we move it to the front of the house for Hindu festivals with the addition of a garland of flowers naturally.




With thanks to my civil partner, the creator of the garden, the source of the idea of having a cow and the photographer.

A sense of place....continued

My friend Antonio De Vecchi took this picture of his (and my) friend Antonello Ronca at the entrance to the British Library in London. This building is very important for me as it has been the best of places in which to work. I always think having it as a work base removes excuses for not working and time wasting.

Antonello is to the right and the sculpture, Isaac Newton, is by Jacob Epstein.



Thanks to Antonio for permission to reproduce the photograph.

Friday, 5 August 2011

Transfiguration

Tomorrow, 6th August, is the day Christians celebrate the Transfiguration and it also marks the dropping of the first atom bomb on Japan. A war was brought to an end and a new atomic era started. we do not hear much at the moment about nuclear weapons but there are still with us and we still pay for them. The steam might have gone out of nuclear weapons opposition but they are present in many countries such as India, China, Israel. Still much peace making to do.

Tuesday, 2 August 2011

And this is from the Daily Telegraph

Utoya massacre: a married lesbian couple, an act of heroism and a media silence

Toril Hansen and Hege Dalen. (Photo: Helsingin Sanomat)
Hege Dalen and Toril Hansen. (Photo: Helsingin Sanomat)
There have been several reports, since the horrifying attacks in Oslo and Utoya island two weeks ago in which 76 people died, of the heroic actions of civilians who risked their own lives to save teenagers fleeing the gunman. The New York Times and we at the Telegraph both mention a German tourist, Marcel Gleffe, who recognised the sound of gunfire and leapt into his boat to go and rescue victims. A BBC reportmentions a man known only as Helge, who took five youths, including two seriously wounded, from the island in his boat. Yahoo News hailed Otto Loevik, who came under fire from the gunman as he rescued “40 to 50 terrified youths”, and is still haunted by the choices he had to make of who to pick up and who to leave behind. I think we can all agree that these are heroes by any definition you care to choose.
Two names who you may not have heard mentioned are Toril Hansen and Hege Dalen, a married couple who rescued 40 teenagers from the shore of Utoya. Their boat was hit by bullets after their first run, but they returned for a second – and a third, and a fourth. Again, pure heroism – but, seemingly, ignored by the press, only picked up by a few specialist blogs, a Finnish newspaper and thousands of people on Twitter.
The reason for that near-silence, some are suggesting, is because Hansen and Dalen are a lesbian couple.
The blog Talk About Equality asks: “If a married lesbian couple saves 40 teens from the Norway massacre and no-one writes about it, did it really happen?” It points out that the “heavy hitters who usually kill for hero stories like this have remained silent.”
Is this fair? Have the media ignored a gold-plated tale of bravery and heroism just because they don’t like the sexual orientation of the protagonists? I don’t know, obviously. I’m not privy to the inner workings of our own editorial procedure, let alone that of anywhere else. But it’s not as though it’s just traditionally minded, conservative news organisations, who might be expected to have misgivings about homosexual marriage, which have not reported on Mrs Hansen and Mrs Dalen’s heroism. The Guardian and The Independent – and, indeed, the aforementioned New York Times – are all proudly liberal papers, but none seem to have covered it.
Of course, in the hours after the event, they would most likely have got their stories from newswires and local press, so it’s conceivable that – for whatever reason – those sources had their own biases. Maybe a lesbian couple doesn’t fit the mould of heroic rescuer that we in the media are used to, so the interview-hungry hacks at the scene gathered around burly, bearded Scandinavian men who more easily met their preconceptions. But I think it’s more likely that it’s just that, in the panicked days after the attacks, they just never happened to speak to a journalist. I can’t imagine many reporters ignoring their story if they met them; indeed (no great improvement though this might be) the lesbian “angle” might make it more appealing to a certain, more salacious brand of journalism. I may be wrong, I may be ignoring a deep-seated strain of homophobia that runs through the press of Europe and America alike, but in general I tend to assume cock-up rather than conspiracy.
Whatever happened, whatever the reason, though, they deserve to be honoured. If I do have the great privilege of being the first person from a major national US or UK newspaper to mention them – which, by now, surely I can’t – then I am happy to say the following to the guys and girls at Talk About Equality: it did happen; Mrs Hansen and Mrs Dalen are heroes of the first order; and I am proud to write about them.